The Lagos State Office of the Public Defender has been ordered by Justice Hakeem Oshodi of the Ikeja High Court to take over the case of Evans, also known as Chukwudimeme Onwuamadike, due to his inability to afford legal fees.
The Attorney-General of Lagos State, Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN), during proceedings on Friday revealed that it contacted the law chambers of Ladi Williams (SAN) and Co, who represented Evans on the last court date to enquire about the whereabouts of Evans’ counsel.
Onigbanjo in his statement further stated that his team was informed by the chambers that Evans has not “perfected their brief”.
Evans who was arraigned alongside five others on August 30, 2017, on two counts of conspiracy and kidnapping has changed lawyers at least five times during the course of his trial.
The suspected kidnap kingpin had been earlier represented by Mr Olukoya Ogungbeje, Mr Noel Brown and Mr Olanrewaju Ajanaku.
Justice Oshodi while reacting to the absence of the defence counsel, noted that Evans had developed a habit of engaging the services of lawyers who according to the judge, “disappeared halfway through a trial” and this has caused delays in the case.
“There are five other defendants with different counsel, the interest of the first defendant (Evans) is not superior to those of the other defendants.”
“The court will not breach Section 36(6) of the 1999 Constitution by going ahead with today’s business of the court which is the hearing of the no-case submissions,” he said.
Justice Oshodi thereafter ordered an OPD counsel who was in court, Ms E.E. Okonkwo, to takeover Evans’ defence.
Following the judge’s ruling, Evans co-defendants -Ogechi Uchechukwu, Chilaka Ifeanyi, Okwuchukwu Nwachukwu, and Victor Aduba filed no-case submissions asking the court to dismiss the charges against them.
The second defendant, Uche Amadi, however, did not file a no-case submission.
The defence counsel, Roger Adewole, Olanrewaju Ajanaku, M.C Izokwu and Emmanuel Ochai told the court that no prima facie (correct until proven otherwise) case has been made against the defendants by the state.
The lawyers urged the court to dismiss the case against the defendants.
Responding, the AG asked the court to dismiss the no-case submissions of the four co-defendants.
“The defendants are asking the court to do something that cannot be done. They are asking the court to analyse evidence and go beyond the window that no-case submissions require.”
“All that the court needs to do is to show that there is prima facie evidence. There is before the court, legally admittable prima facie evidence enough for the defendants to enter their defence.”
“I urge the court to dismiss all the applications and that the defendants proceed to enter into their defence,” Onigbanjo said.